<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MFNW Adds Glacial Pace Showcase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.wweek.com/music/2009/07/07/mfnw-adds-glacial-pace-showcase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.wweek.com/music/2009/07/07/mfnw-adds-glacial-pace-showcase/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.wweek.com Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:23:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim-Bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wweek.com/music/2009/07/07/mfnw-adds-glacial-pace-showcase/comment-page-1/#comment-488273</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim-Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wweek.com/music/?p=8422#comment-488273</guid>
		<description>Okay, well if you&#039;re going to be that remorseful about it, in re-reading my first missive I was a bit harsh, and I apologize for that. &quot;Burning Stars&quot; was the &quot;one song&quot; to which I was referring, and I can see your point as far as that goes. I would just hope that people give this band a chance on their own merits, because they&#039;ve got a damned fantastic debut coming out.

No, I&#039;m not in any way affiliated with the band, label, etc.

Anyway, again, apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, well if you&#8217;re going to be that remorseful about it, in re-reading my first missive I was a bit harsh, and I apologize for that. &#8220;Burning Stars&#8221; was the &#8220;one song&#8221; to which I was referring, and I can see your point as far as that goes. I would just hope that people give this band a chance on their own merits, because they&#8217;ve got a damned fantastic debut coming out.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not in any way affiliated with the band, label, etc.</p>
<p>Anyway, again, apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mannheimer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wweek.com/music/2009/07/07/mfnw-adds-glacial-pace-showcase/comment-page-1/#comment-488262</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mannheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wweek.com/music/?p=8422#comment-488262</guid>
		<description>Hey Jim-Bob,

I see your point, but I definitely didn&#039;t intend for it to come off as destructive. It&#039;s hard to deny that Mimicking Bird&#039;s recorded material—especially the song I was listening to at the time, &quot;Burning Stars&quot;—bears a strong resemblance to The Moon and Antartica-era Modest Mouse. But you have a great point: Mimicking Birds are far from a &quot;rip-off afterthought,&quot; and my lazy description doesn&#039;t do them much justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jim-Bob,</p>
<p>I see your point, but I definitely didn&#8217;t intend for it to come off as destructive. It&#8217;s hard to deny that Mimicking Bird&#8217;s recorded material—especially the song I was listening to at the time, &#8220;Burning Stars&#8221;—bears a strong resemblance to The Moon and Antartica-era Modest Mouse. But you have a great point: Mimicking Birds are far from a &#8220;rip-off afterthought,&#8221; and my lazy description doesn&#8217;t do them much justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim-Bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wweek.com/music/2009/07/07/mfnw-adds-glacial-pace-showcase/comment-page-1/#comment-488257</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim-Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wweek.com/music/?p=8422#comment-488257</guid>
		<description>Nice un-necessary dismissal: Mimicking Birds are summed up as &quot;very Modest Mouse-y&quot; based on what? One song? Fine, fine, you followed it up with a &quot;though still great,&quot; but the point is that when you write something like that here, most take it as absolute fact. 

In the context, you&#039;re presenting them as a rip-off afterthought, when anyone who&#039;s seen Nate Lacy&#039;s band live knows that there&#039;s something special going on there. Do you have to start tearing down already? Why not take out those destructive energies on someone whose current work merits it....like Modest Mouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice un-necessary dismissal: Mimicking Birds are summed up as &#8220;very Modest Mouse-y&#8221; based on what? One song? Fine, fine, you followed it up with a &#8220;though still great,&#8221; but the point is that when you write something like that here, most take it as absolute fact. </p>
<p>In the context, you&#8217;re presenting them as a rip-off afterthought, when anyone who&#8217;s seen Nate Lacy&#8217;s band live knows that there&#8217;s something special going on there. Do you have to start tearing down already? Why not take out those destructive energies on someone whose current work merits it&#8230;.like Modest Mouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
