Logo

The Hallman Photo. . .and Its Aftermath


5:35 PM March 6th, 2007 by Nigel Jaquiss
News / Story Forum | Email This Post Email This Post |

news89

There were no winners in last week’s WW reader photo quiz, least of all The Oregonian’s Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Tom Hallman Jr.images
Last week, we asked readers (see “Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Contest,” WW, Feb. 28, 2007) to look at photos of this car and its license plate (reprinted here) and answer the following questions:
1. Who owns the gray 1992 Cadillac?
2. What’s the significance of the “SMKE” license plate?
3. Where’s the car parked (in the photos and on most business days)?
4. What’s the significance of the parking space?
Well, here are the answers:
1. The car belongs to Hallman.
2. The personalized license plate alludes to a line in Hallman’s Pulitzer-winning profile of Sam Lightner, the 2000 series “The Boy Behind the Mask,” describing how the facially disfigured teenager “moves like smoke.”
3. For some time, Hallman has been parking his Caddy at no charge at 1410 SW Jefferson St., headquarters of Fog Cutter Capital (seven blocks west of The Oregonian’s offices).
4. The significance of this is that Fog Cutter’s CEO is Andy Wiederhorn, the entrepreneurial wunderkind whom Hallman profiled glowingly in a piece titled “The $100 Million Dad.” Hallman followed up in 1999 with a seven-part series detailing the challenges Wiederhorn faced as his empire collapsed. Then in 2004, Wiederhorn pleaded guilty to filing a false tax return and paying an illegal gratuity, charges stemming from an investigation into the largest pension-fund fraud in U.S. history.
We sent Hallman and Oregonian executive editor Peter Bhatia written questions asking whether they thought it was appropriate for the reporter to park his car in a spot owned by Wiederhorn’s company. Neither man responded. But apparently management at the daily has since taken action.

According to sources and an email sent Monday by Oregonian Editor Sandra Mims Rowe to staff, Hallman faces multiple punishments.
The reporter has been suspended two weeks without pay, his senior reporter’s salary (estimated by one newsroom insider to be $90,000, or about $12,000 more than top scale for an average reporter) is frozen, and he will be moved from the paper’s plum-assignment enterprise team to a less prestigious, still-to-be-determined beat.
Hallman was also told that he can’t represent the paper in public forums for the foreseeable future and must undergo ethics training with managing editor Therese Bottomly. And Hallman must repay Wiederhorn $500 for use of the parking space, even though Wiederhorn doesn’t charge for spaces in the lot.
“As most of you have heard, we took a series of disciplinary steps last week involving Tom Hallman. Tom had accepted an offer from Andy Wiederhorn last year to park in the lot at his Goose Hollow offices,” Rowe wrote.
“Tom did so over a period of months. Tom has acknowledged that accepting this offer was a serious ethical breach, given Wiederhorn’s controversial past, the fact he continues to be in the news and because Tom did a series on Wiederhorn eight years ago,” Rowe added. “At the time, it didn’t occur to him this would be a problem, as he no longer reports on Wiederhorn or had any plans to do so in the future. Tom acknowledges his failure in judgment, is extremely contrite, has apologized repeatedly and deeply regrets any impact this may have on the paper.”
Rowe also wrote: “Tom is a loyal and talented 26-year employee whose work at The Oregonian has established his place with readers as well as among journalism’s best narrative writers. This does not change. When he returns we will welcome him back and support him, just as this newsroom does when any of our colleagues face personal or professional difficulties.” (To read Rowe’s entire email, click here)

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
advertisement
advertisement

12 Responses to “The Hallman Photo. . .and Its Aftermath”

  1. whatamask says:

    It didn’t occur to him this would be a problem? That is either completely disingenuous or it shows an almost unbelievable level of stupidity.

    And “among journalism’s best”? Maybe he was, but actually, that does change now, Ms. Rowe.

  2. Puddlejumper says:

    Can you remind us of that whole dust-up over that math guy that Hallman wrote about? Was he accused of making stuff up?

  3. Foodstamp Fanny says:

    Typical of the Ole Boy establishment at the Oregonian and everywhere else in journalism. How well this illustrates it!! The rules are so different for men and women!! Hallman should have been busted completely out of the corps forever for this ethical lapse, but of course he won’t be.

  4. Ben Westhoff says:

    Busted out of the corps forever? Put the glass down, ya W.I.C. wannabe. He apologized, he was punished. Not for nothing, he led a seminar a year ago that changed my life — and I know there are others like me out there. Best of luck, Tom.

  5. Victoria Taft 5-8pm KPAM AM "The Talk Station" says:

    http://www.victoriataft.com
    Is this anything like the University of Oregon journalism chair who signed off on giving a reporter an ethics award who paid two grand to a source of a story? Oh, never mind…

  6. Kevin says:

    Wow, I wish I could park downtown for $500 a year.

  7. dartagnan says:

    Excuse me, but I don’t see what the big friggin deal is here. The story says Wiederhorn didn’t charge for use of the spaces in the lot, so how did Hallman reap any financial benefit? It’s also clear that Hallman didn’t do Wiederhorn any favors in terms of how he reported on his past business and ethical problems. So not only was there no quid pro quo, there wasn’t even any quo.

    This looks to me like WW making another mountain out of an ethical molehill.

  8. walter says:

    The big deal is this: Newspapers typically prohibit reporters from accepting gifts other than inexpensive trinkets (pen, t-shirt, coffee cup). Hallman broke the rule big time by accepting a gift that is probably worth more than $500. And who is to say whether Hallman might one day write a nice profile of one of Wiederhorn’s associates.

  9. MaxRedline says:

    Oh, the O does this all the time. They took Johnny Nicholas off for a couple of weeks after he was found to have plagiarized material, but he’s still there. They don’t actually punish folks over there. They pull them for a couple of weeks, then pat them on the butt and tell them to run back in and play.

    Bluntly put, The Oregonian doesn’t understand the term, “ethics”. And they wonder why their subscription rates are dropping so fast.

  10. David Lightner says:

    This is directed to Ben Westhoff. I would be curious as to the nature of the seminar that changed your life?

  11. ilikemike97 says:

    This guy is some schnook. Free parking 7 blocks away from your gig? What does he take a cab from there? The guy is driving a 15 year old car. How about a new caddy? That’s my idea of a reasonable bribe.

  12. [...] According to an article last July by Jeff Manning of The Oregonian, Wiederhorn was planning to move from Portland to Beverly Hills. Manning has consistently tracked Wiederhorn’s financial woes since the financier was treated to glowing profiles by The O’s Tom Hallman Jr. [...]

Leave a Reply


 


More


More


More


More


More


More


More


More

Ad

Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips
Camping Gear