<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Packing Heat? House Judiciary Says It&#8217;s None of Your Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.wweek.com/news/2009/04/16/whos-packing-heat-house-judiciary-says-its-none-of-your-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.wweek.com/news/2009/04/16/whos-packing-heat-house-judiciary-says-its-none-of-your-business/</link>
	<description>The Blog Formerly Known As WWire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:42:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wweek.com/news/2009/04/16/whos-packing-heat-house-judiciary-says-its-none-of-your-business/comment-page-1/#comment-88732</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wweek.com/news/?p=26499#comment-88732</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Oregonians’ right to know...&quot;

Who ever said that people have a right no know? What about a right to privacy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Oregonians’ right to know&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Who ever said that people have a right no know? What about a right to privacy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt G.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wweek.com/news/2009/04/16/whos-packing-heat-house-judiciary-says-its-none-of-your-business/comment-page-1/#comment-88667</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wweek.com/news/?p=26499#comment-88667</guid>
		<description>I have yet to hear a single coherent explanation of why it&#039;s in the public interest to reveal the names of CCW permit-holders. Quite to the contrary, such disclosure would almost entirely defeat the purpose--providing unexpected self-defense--of obtaining such a permit. We&#039;re all safer if would-be criminals have to fear that anybody could be packing heat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to hear a single coherent explanation of why it&#8217;s in the public interest to reveal the names of CCW permit-holders. Quite to the contrary, such disclosure would almost entirely defeat the purpose&#8211;providing unexpected self-defense&#8211;of obtaining such a permit. We&#8217;re all safer if would-be criminals have to fear that anybody could be packing heat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
